Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)


6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2011
Legal Matters and Contingencies [Text Block]
NOTE 11:                    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

a.           Stockholders Derivative Complaint:

On May 6, 2009 a purported stockholders derivative complaint (the “Derivative Complaint”) was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against the Company and certain of the Company’s officers and directors related to its acquisition of Armour of America in 2005 and certain public statements made by the Company with respect to its business and prospects, including allegations that the Company did not have adequate systems of internal operational or financial controls, and that the Company’s financial statements and reports were not prepared in accordance with GAAP and SEC rules. The Company moved for dismissal of the Derivative Complaint in March of 2010, and the Derivative Complaint was dismissed without prejudice on March 31, 2011.

b.           NAVAIR Litigation:

On January 10, 2011, a judgment and decision was unsealed and issued for publication in respect of the lawsuit in the United States Court of Federal Claims by Armour of America, Incorporated (“AoA”), a subsidiary that the Company purchased in August 2004, against the United States Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR). The lawsuit, which was based on events that had occurred prior to the Company’s purchase of AoA, had sought approximately $2.2 million in damages for NAVAIR’s alleged improper termination of a contract for the design, test and manufacture of a lightweight armor replacement system for the United States Marine Corps CH-46E rotor helicopter. NAVAIR, in its answer, counterclaimed for approximately $2.1 million in alleged reprocurement and administrative costs. The court’s decision found against AoA and in favor of NAVAIR, and awarded NAVAIR reprocurement and administrative costs in the total amount of approximately $1.55 million. The Company filed a notice of appeal in respect of a substantial portion of the court’s decision. However, the Company has come to an agreement with NAVAIR under which the Company has agreed to pay the judgment in full in the third quarter of 2011.

In light of the judge’s decision in this case, the Company recorded a charge of approximately $1.55 million in our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010.